Bindinglaw

ND · rules

N.D. R. Local Ct. P.R. 1

Statement of Policy

activein force · 2001-01-01 – presentact-effective-date

It is the policy of the Supreme Court of North Dakota to provide effective procedure for the promulgation of Local Court Rules, for the continuing study and review of Local Court Rules, to provide notice and opportunity to express views regarding Local Court Rules, and to provide a mechanism for the amendment and repeal of Local Court Rules.

The Supreme Court will exercise its authority, from time to time, to delegate the authority to adopt, amend, or repeal Local Court Procedural Rules and Administrative Rules which are consistent with the rules and orders of the Supreme Court, and to prescribe methods and procedures required in connection therewith.

History

COMMENT The Rules Sub-Committee recognizes that at present the authority of local courts to promulgate procedural rules and administrative rules arises from the inherent powers of courts, and the delegated authority pursuant to Rule 83, NDRCivP, Rule 57, NDRCrimP, Administrative Order No. 1, and various statutes including: Section 12-44-04, NDCC, relating to County Jail Rules. The Rules Sub-Committee deplores and disapproves the necessity for local procedural rules promulgated pursuant to Rule 83, NDRCivP and Rule 57, NDRCrimP. Recognition of the need for a comprehensive local rule-making process as proposed here, does not imply in any way approval of the necessity for any particular local procedural rule nor does it imply encouragement of this practice when it contributes to fragmentation of applicable procedural rules. The goal of this proposed rule is one of maximum uniformity of procedural rules among all courts. The Rules Sub-Committee strongly discourages local judicial districts from promulgating local procedural rules which promote procedural rule diversity. It strongly encourages the Supreme Court to take necessary steps to assure that promulgation of uniform procedural rules of statewide application be encouraged and expedited wherever possible.

Provenance

Source
www.ndcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
283faf719e9bb01201eaf5ca3b7c42dcc02a0ae39d38c601ca598857681421bb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.