ND · rules
N.D. R. Ct. app. F
Rule 8.8 Alternative Dispute Resolution Statement
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF ______
_____ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
A.B.,
)
Civil No. ________
Plaintiff,
)
)
N.D.R.Ct. 8.8
vs.
)
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
)
RESOLUTION STATEMENT
C.D.,
)
Defendant.
)
a.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ("ADR") PROCESS (check one):
____
Counsel, after discussing ADR with their clients, agree that ADR is appropriate and choose the following:
____
Mediation
____
Arbitration (non-binding)
____
Arbitration (binding)
____
Court-Sponsored Settlement Conference
____
Other (explain)
____
Counsel, after discussing ADR with their clients, agree that ADR is NOT appropriate because:
____
the case implicates the federal or state constitution
____
domestic violence has occurred between the parties
____
other (explain)
____
Counsel, after discussing ADR with their clients, have determined that it is not possible to state at this time whether ADR is appropriate.Counsel agree thatthey will file a statement with the Court on whether ADR is appropriate no later than___________________
b.
PROVIDER (check one):
____
The parties have selected the following ADR neutral:
____
The parties would like ADR conducted by a judicial officer or employee and request the Court to appoint one.The parties request that the Court schedule such ADR within the following time frame:___________________
____
The parties cannot agree on an ADR neutral and request the Court to appoint one.
____
The parties agreed to select an ADR neutral on or before ___________________
c.
DEADLINE: The parties recommend that the ADR process be completed by ________ ____________________.
Signed: _________________________
Signed ____________________________
Lawyer for (Plaintiff)
Lawyer for (Defendant)
Attorney ID #: ___________________
Attorney ID #: ______________________
Firm: ___________________________
Firm: _____________________________
Address: ________________________
Address: ___________________________
Telephone: ______________________
Telephone: _________________________
Date: __________________________
Date: ______________________________
History
[Adopted effective March 1, 2001; amended effective March 1, 2003 .]
Provenance
- Source
- www.ndcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
ec373a6cd6c342a78c5b3254ae2320aaf5d75e9e2d47b285e9425637054d11ee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.