Bindinglaw

ND · rules

N.D. R. Ct. 3.3

Change of Judge for Postjudgment Motion or Proceeding

activein force · 2003-03-01 – presentact-effective-date

Any postjudgment motion or proceeding must be heard by the same judge before whom the underlying matter was heard, subject to the following exceptions:

(1) A different judge may hear a postjudgment motion or proceeding if for any reason the original judge is unable to act.

(2) A different judge may hear a postjudgment motion or proceeding as provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-15-21(3).

(3) In nonfelony cases, a different judge may amend or enforce a condition in a judgment or order entered on a verdict or plea of guilty.

(4) In child support cases, a different judge may amend or enforce a child support order or judgment.

History

Rule 3.3 was amended, effective March 1, 2003. Rule 3.3 was adopted, effective March 1, 2000. The rule allows a judge to consolidate proceedings venued in the same county when a misdemeanant violates the conditions of more than one judgment. Rule 3.3 was amended, effective March 1, 2003, to allow judges to amend or enforce child support orders or judgments regardless of whether the particular judge rendered the original order or judgment. SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of April 25-26, 2002, pages 5-8; January 24-25, 2002, pages 14-16; September 24-25, 1998, pages 5-6; April 30-May 1, 1998, pages 5-6. STATUTES AFFECTED: SUPERSEDED: N.D.C.C. § 27-05-27.

Provenance

Source
www.ndcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
3c43d6dc6b8d04c9b56a4c46444a61116b3013d6b79136ad0adcdfe270902452
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.D. R. Ct. 3.3 — Change of Judge for Postjudgment Mo… · binding.law