NC · rules
N.C. Canons of Ethics for Arbitrators Canon I
An arbitrator shall uphold the integrity and fairness of the arbitration process.
A. Fair and just processes for resolving disputes are indispensable in our
society. Arbitration is an important method for deciding many types of disputes.
For arbitration to be effective, there must be broad public confidence in and
understanding of the integrity and fairness of the process. Therefore, an arbitrator
has a responsibility not only to the parties but also to the courts, the public and the
process of arbitration itself and must observe high standards of conduct so that the
integrity and fairness of the process will be preserved. Accordingly, an arbitrator has
a responsibility to the public, parties whose rights will be decided, the courts, and
other participants in the proceeding. These Canons shall be construed and applied
to further these objectives.
B. It may be inconsistent with the integrity of the arbitration process for
persons to solicit appointment for themselves. However, persons may indicate a
general willingness to serve as arbitrators, e.g., by listing themselves with
institutions that sponsor arbitration, or with courts that have court-annexed
arbitration programs. Arbitrators may advertise, consistent with the law.
C. Persons may accept appointment as arbitrators only if they believe that
they can be available to conduct the arbitration promptly. They shall exercise
judgment whether their skills or expertise are sufficient to support demands of the
arbitration and, if these skills or expertise are not sufficient, they shall decline to
serve or withdraw from the arbitration, with the court’s approval in
court-administered arbitration, and notice to the parties.
D. After accepting appointment and while serving as an arbitrator, a
person shall avoid entering into any financial, business, professional, family or social
relationship, or acquiring any financial or personal interest likely to affect
impartiality or which might reasonably create the appearance of partiality or bias.
For one year after decision of a case, persons who have served as arbitrators shall
avoid entering into any such relationship, or acquiring any such interest, in the
circumstances which might reasonably create the appearance that they had been
influenced in the arbitration by the anticipation or expectation of the relationship or
interest, unless all parties to the arbitration consent to any such relationship or
acquiring any such interest.
E. Arbitrators shall conduct themselves in a way that is fair, in word and
action, to all parties and must not be swayed by outside pressure, public clamor, fear
of criticism or self-interest. If an arbitrator determines that he or she cannot serve
impartially, that arbitrator shall decline appointment or withdraw from serving and
shall notify the parties, and the court in court-administered arbitrations.
F. When an arbitrator’s authority is derived from the parties’ agreement,
the arbitrator shall not exceed that authority nor do less than required to exercise
that authority completely. Where the parties’ agreement sets forth procedures to be
followed in conducting the arbitration or refers to rules to be followed, the arbitrator
must comply with such procedures or rules.
G. An arbitrator shall make all reasonable efforts to prevent delaying
tactics, harassment of parties or other participants, or other abuse or disruption of
the arbitration process.
H. An arbitrator’s ethical obligations begin upon acceptance of
appointment and continue throughout all stages of the proceeding. In addition,
wherever specifically set forth in these Canons, certain ethical obligations begin as
soon as a person is asked to serve as an arbitrator and continue for one year after the
decision in the case has been given to the parties.
I. An experienced arbitrator should participate in development of new
practitioners in the field and should engage in efforts to educate the public about the
value and use of arbitration procedures. An arbitrator should provide pro bono
services, as appropriate.
History
Comment References to “commercial” in American Bar that is condemned in some professional Association & American Arbitration Association, standards, e.g., those for lawyers. Arbitrators Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial must be mindful of fairness, neutrality, disclosure Disputes, Canon I (1977) (Code), 33 Bus. Law. and conflict of interest principles stated in these 311 (1977), from which these Canons have been Canons. The last sentence in Canon I.B makes it adapted, have been deleted. Excess verbiage has clear that the Canons should not be read to forbid been deleted. The catchline has been changed arbitrator advertising where, e.g., commercial from “should” to “shall” to underscore the free speech principles under the Constitution mandatory nature of the principle; “should” has allow it. The addition in Canon I.C is taken from been omitted in Canon I.A in the penultimate Standards I.B–I.C and covers situations of sentence, and the language amended, to court-appointed arbitrators under, e.g., the underscore this. “Should” in the last sentence has Uniform Arbitration Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. been changed to “shall.” “Should” has been § 1-567.4, or in court-annexed arbitrations; these changed to “shall” or “must” in other parts of the arbitrators are subject to court order appointing Canon. them, and the court is the final arbiter of these issues. The thrust of Canon I.C is consistent with Other additions in Canon I.A follow the Revised North Carolina Rules of Professional Preamble to North Carolina Dispute Resolution Conduct 1.1 (Rule), although the latter deals with Commission, Standards of Conduct for competence of a lawyer, and the Canon governs Mediators, 344 N.C. 753 (Standards). competence to serve as an arbitrator. The addition in Canon I.B gives examples of Canon I.D states a one-year rule instead of the circumstances in which persons may offer “reasonable time” principle of the Code. services as arbitrators. It is consistent with The one-year rule has been substituted to N.C. Ct-Ord. Arb. R. 2(a). Unlike the Code, coincide with the time in the Federal Arbitration Canon I.B says it “may be” inconsistent with the Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 9–11, during which a party can integrity of the arbitration process to solicit move to set aside an award. The Uniform appointment as an arbitrator. This is because of Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-567.13–1-567.14, the difficulty, e.g., in drawing a line between requires set-aside applications to be made within advertisement permitted by law and solicitation 90 days of an award. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and N.C. R. Civ. P. 60(b) limit certain judgment set-aside motions to one year. One year has been chosen as the time when nearly all conflict issues would arise and be resolved. The addition to Canon I.D, penultimate sentence, follows the consent rule in Rule 1.12(a). Additions in Canon II.E follow Standard II.C, with additions to cover court-annexed arbitration or arbitrations where a court has appointed an arbitrator under, e.g., the Uniform Act. “Asked” replaces “requested” in Canon I.H. The phrase “continues for one year” has been added to coincide with the one-year rule for Canon I.D. Canon I.I has been adapted from Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, Ethical Standards of Professional Conduct, Support of the Profession (1987) ( SPIDR Standards ), reprinted in Rena A. Gorlin, Codes of Professional Responsibility 327 (2d ed. 1990); unlike standards applicable to arbitrators in proceedings, Canon I.I is hortatory, not mandatory. The Rules do not include the equivalent of ABA, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, which says a lawyer should aspire to provide 50 hours of public service a year. See Alice Neece Moseley et al., An Overview of the Revised North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct: An Examination of the Interests History Note. 350 N.C. 876.
Provenance
- Source
- ncleg.gov; ncbar.gov; nccourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- 2026-09-17
- Content hash
1f84bb2b703238d8c17a59fb6bd6013bbc7394e2253aab4c810684ee2ff6c8e0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.