NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 225.11
DRIVING WHILE TEXTING.
The motor vehicle law1 provides that it is unlawful for any person to
operate a vehicle on a [public street] [highway] [public vehicular area]
while using a mobile telephone to
[manually enter multiple letters or text in the device as a means of
communicating with another person.2]
[read any electronic mail or text message transmitted to the device
or stored within the device, provided that this prohibition shall not apply
to any name or number stored in the device nor to any caller
identification information.3]
[In addition, this law does not apply to
[the operator of a vehicle that is lawfully parked or stopped.4]
[[a law enforcement officer] [a member of a fire department] [the
operator of a public or private ambulance] while in the performance of his
official duties.5]
[the use of factory-installed or aftermarket global positioning
systems (GPS) or wireless communications devices used to transmit or
receive data as part of a digital dispatch system.6]
[the use of voice operated technology.7]
Operation of a vehicle in violation of this law is not negligence
within itself. However, the evidence with regard to it is to be considered
with all the other facts in evidence in determining whether the operator
was negligent.
History
N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 225.11 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-137.4A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
152375d2f9a353849874dca1b1c27ef4f02b3fb89454efd7f119031794a45a49
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.