Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 211.75

PEDESTRIANS-DUTY OF LOOKOUT-PEDESTRIANS WITH THE RIGHT-OF- WAY.

activein force · 1989-06-01 – presentas-observed

The law provides that a pedestrian with the right-of-way has a duty

to exercise ordinary care for his own safety, which includes the keeping of

a reasonable lookout. However, he is not required to anticipate that the

operator of a motor vehicle will fail to obey the law by not yielding him

the right-of-way. He may assume, even up to the last moment, that an

operator will obey the law and yield the right-of-way. If, however, the

circumstances put or should put the pedestrian on notice that an operator

might fail to yield the right-of-way, the pedestrian must heed that notice

and exercise ordinary care for his own safety.2

A pedestrian's failure to notice that the operator might fail to yield

the right-of-way is not negligence within itself. However, the failure to

notice that the operator might fail to yield the right-of-way and failure to

exercise ordinary care for his own safety when, under the same or similar

circumstances, a reasonably careful and prudent person would have taken

notice and exercised ordinary care for his own safety, would be

negligence.

History

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 211.75 (June 1989). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
9a3a1c666c9fb1a398e070e3bc7f6a2f170af322af49a9e014dece394992db32
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.