Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 211.36

PEDESTRIAN-CROSSING AT PLACES WITH VEHICULAR TRAFFIC-CONTROL SIGNALS OTHER THAN AT INTERSECTIONS.

activein force · 1989-06-01 – presentas-observed

The motor vehicle law provides that (where there are no special

pedestrian-control signals)1 pedestrians shall be subject to any vehicular

traffic-control signals as they apply to pedestrian traffic.2 Where there

are vehicular traffic-control signals at places other than intersections, and

when such a signal is emitting a [steady] [flashing] red light facing

vehicular traffic, pedestrians may proceed across the [highway] [street]3

in front of the vehicular traffic.4 However,

(Choose one or more of the following paragraphs as

appropriate.)

[(Green light). When there is a signal light at a place other than

an intersection emitting a steady green light facing vehicular traffic,

pedestrians shall not start to cross the [highway] [street].]

[(Yellow light). When there is a signal light at a place other than

an intersection emitting a steady yellow light facing vehicular traffic,

pedestrians shall not start to cross the [highway] [street].]

[(Flashing yellow light). When there is a signal light at a place

other than an intersection emitting a flashing yellow light facing vehicular

traffic, a pedestrian must yield the right-of-way to approaching vehicles.

He may proceed across the [highway] [street] when, in the exercise of

reasonable care and prudence, he can proceed with reasonable assurance

of safety to himself and others. Whether he can proceed with such

assurance of safety depends upon the distance of approaching vehicles

from the place with the signal and their speed of approach. Unless the

circumstances indicate that there is no danger of collision with an

approaching vehicle, it is his duty to wait until the approaching vehicle

has passed.5]

A violation of [this duty] [these duties] is not negligence within

itself. However, a failure to obey the signal light when, under the same

or similar circumstances, a reasonably careful and prudent person would

have obeyed the signal light, would be negligence.

History

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 211.36 (June 1989). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-172(c), 20-158(c)(2), (3), (4). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
4faeee04905132dafaf278bda5a73d458506f2cbdcd9dd901d5f6b2c1bb85470
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.