NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 109.00
DEFENDANT'S PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES (COUNTERCLAIM)-ISSUE AND BURDEN OF PROOF.
The (state number) issue reads:
"What amount is the defendant entitled to recover for personal
injury?"
If you have answered the (state number) issue "Yes" (and the
(state number) issue "No") in favor of the defendant, the defendant is
entitled to recover nominal damages even without proof of actual
damages. Nominal damages consist of some trivial amount such as one
dollar in recognition of a technical injury to the defendant.
The defendant may also be entitled to recover actual damages. On
this issue the burden of proof is on the defendant. This means that the
defendant must prove, by the greater weight of the evidence, the amount
of actual damages proximately caused by the negligence of the plaintiff.
NOTE WELL: If fault is admitted, stipulated or
determined by summary judgment, the jury will still
need to be instructed on proximate cause. Give
N.C.P.I.-Civil 102.19 ("Proximate Cause-Definition-
Multiple Causes") and, as appropriate, such other
causation instructions as are supported by the
evidence (e.g., N.C.P.I.-Civil 102.20 to 102.28).
History
N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 109.00 (May 2000). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
dba79b266c18389d898076a8e68240888737b016b05d26739b031b7dfadfb9f3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.