Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 108.50

FINAL MANDATE-ISSUE OF PLAINTIFF'S NEGLIGENCE (COUNTERCLAIM).

activein force · 1993-06-01 – presentas-observed

Finally, as to this (state number) issue on which defendant has the

burden of proof, if you find, by the greater weight of the evidence, that

the plaintiff was negligent and that such negligence was a proximate

cause of the defendant's [injury] [damage], then it would be your duty to

answer this issue "Yes" in favor of the defendant.

If, on the other hand you fail to so find, then it would be your duty

to answer this issue "No" in favor of the plaintiff.

History

N.C.P.I.—Motor Vehicle 108.50 (June 1993). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
697d78c8fd55418d25e4e99c358e0818883e32d100e399a0787cec9e7bb0dc42
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.