Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 285.25

[SALE] [ATTEMPTED SALE] [PURCHASE] [AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE] OF ABSENTEE VOTING MATERIALS. FELONY.

activein force · 2021-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with the [sale] [attempted sale]

[purchase] [agreement to purchase] of absentee voting materials.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt.

First, the defendant [sold] [attempted to sell] [purchased] [agreed

to purchase] absentee voting materials.

And Second, the voting material was a [completed written request

for an absentee ballot] [completed application for an absentee ballot]

[voted absentee ballot].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [sold], [attempted to sell]

[purchased] [agreed to purchase] a [completed written request for an

absentee ballot] [completed application for an absentee ballot] [voted

absentee ballot] it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you

do not so find or if you have reasonable doubt as to one or both of these

things, then you would return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 285.25 (June 2021). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-237(d)(1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
ec6146e52426c8c70a294d5e91d8f112daaf253a3d9a3fd93c0096ba005c4f88
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.