Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 274.21

FELONIOUSLY OBTAINING FOOD STAMPS BY MISREPRESENTATION—MORE THAN $400. FELONY; MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2001-10-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: In the event that the offense charged is the

transfer of food stamps or authorization cards with intent to

defraud, adjust the charge accordingly.

The defendant has been charged with feloniously obtaining food

stamps by misrepresentation.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant knowingly [obtained] [attempted to obtain]

food stamps.

Second, that the defendant willfully [obtained] [attempted to obtain]

the food stamps by means of [making false statements or representations]

[impersonation] [failure to disclose material facts].

Third, that the defendant was not entitled to the food stamps.

And Fourth, that the value of the food stamps the defendant

[obtained] [attempted to obtain] and to which he was not entitled was more

than $400.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant willfully and knowingly [obtained]

[attempted to obtain] food stamps to which he was not entitled by means of

a(n) [false statement] [impersonation] [failure to disclose a material fact]

and that the value of the food stamps the defendant [obtained] [attempted

to obtain] was more than $400, it would be your duty to return a verdict of

guilty of feloniously obtaining food stamps by misrepresentation. If you do

not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things,

you would not return a verdict of guilty of this offense but would consider

whether the defendant is guilty of misdemeanor obtaining food stamps by

misrepresentation.

The misdemeanor differs from the felony only in that the State need

not prove that the value of the food stamps which the defendant [obtained]

[attempted to obtain] was more than $400.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully and knowingly [obtained]

[attempted to obtain] food stamps to which he was not entitled by means of

a(n) [false statement] [impersonation] [failure to disclose a material fact], it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty of misdemeanor obtaining

food stamps by misrepresentation. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to

return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 274.21 (Replacement October 2001). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 108A-53(a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
467399b78670036200b472d1fcbe58772eab7ea67cb3ac30e70998840c15ab63
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.