NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 273.40
[PURCHASING] [POSSESSING] LICENSE TO HUNT, ETC. WHILE LICENSE IS REVOKED. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with unlawfully [purchasing]
[possessing] a [license] [privilege] [right] to [hunt] [fish] [trap]
[possess] [transport] wildlife while the defendant’s [license] [privilege]
[right] was [suspended] [revoked].
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [purchased] [possessed] a [license]
[privilege] [right] to [hunt] [fish] [trap] [possess] [transport] wildlife.
And Second, that the defendant’s [license] [privilege] [right] was
[suspended] [revoked] at that time.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant [purchased] [possessed] a
[license] [privilege] [right] to [hunt] [fish] [trap] [possess] [transport]
wildlife while the defendant’s [license] [privilege] [right] was [suspended]
[revoked], it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not
so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it
would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 273.40 (June 2009). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113-300.8. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
69321c68883a15bbc7b35795e73d23a7a47cbd9c72d5e2d0b3f3bbca53ae5caf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.