Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 272.60

[SALE] [OFFER FOR SALE] [INTRODUCTION INTO COMMERCE IN NORTH CAROLINA] OF AN E-LIQUID CONTAINER WITHOUT CHILD- RESISTANT PACKAGING. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2016-06-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: Effective for offenses committed on or

after December 1, 2015, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-401.18A

prohibits any person, firm, or corporation from selling,

offering for sale, or introducing into commerce in this

State an e-liquid container unless the container

constitutes child-resistant packaging. Any person, firm,

or corporation violating this provision shall be held

liable in damages to any person injured as a result of

the violation.

The defendant has been charged with the [sale] [offer for sale]

[introduction into commerce in North Carolina] of an e-liquid container for

an e-liquid product without child-resistant packaging.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that defendant [sold] [offered for sale] [introduced into

commerce in North Carolina] an e-liquid container for an e-liquid product.

An e-liquid1 is a liquid product, whether or not it contains nicotine, that

is intended to be vaporized and inhaled using a vapor product.2 An e-liquid container is a bottle or other container of e-liquid.3

And Second, that the e-liquid container for an e-liquid product that

defendant [sold] [offered for sale] [introduced into commerce in North

Carolina] did not constitute child resistant packaging. “Child resistant

packaging” means packaging that is designed or constructed to be

significantly difficult for children under five years of age to open or obtain

a toxic or harmful amount of the substance contained therein within a

reasonable time and not difficult for adults to use properly. The term

“child resistant packaging” does not mean packaging which all such

children cannot open or obtain a toxic or harmful amount within a

reasonable time.4

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [sold] [offered for sale]

[introduced into commerce in North Carolina] an e-liquid container for an

e-liquid product that did not constitute child-resistant packaging, it would

be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 272.60 (June 2016). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-401.18A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
6dbdecb9730e90d20884d4b20ffab683c3030db3a8d4c8ec490576c878eee08f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.