Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.62

REMOVAL OF VEHICLE FROM SCENE AFTER ACCIDENT RESULTING IN [DAMAGE TO PROPERTY] [[INJURY] [DEATH] TO ANY PERSON OF WHICH THE DRIVER WAS UNAWARE]— DRIVER. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2006-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with removal of a vehicle from the

scene of an accident resulting in [damage to property] [[injury] [death] to

any person about which the defendant did not know or have reason to

know].

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was the driver of a vehicle that was involved

in a reportable accident. A reportable accident 1 is one involving a motor

vehicle that results in [death or injury of a human being] [total property

damage of one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more] [property damage of any

amount to a vehicle seized because it was driven by a person charged with

an offense involving impaired driving whose license was already revoked as

a result of a prior impaired driving offense].

Second, that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known

that the vehicle was involved in an [accident] [collision] resulting in [damage

to property] [[injury] [death] to any person about which the defendant did

not know or have reason to know].

Third, that defendant willfully [facilitated] [allowed] [agreed to] the

removal of the vehicle from the scene of the accident (without justification

or excuse). 2

And Fourth, that a law enforcement officer had not [completed the

investigation of the accident] [authorized the removal of the vehicle].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was the driver of a vehicle that was

involved in a reportable accident, that the defendant knew or reasonably

should have known that the vehicle was involved in an [accident] [collision]

resulting in [damage to property] [[injury] [death] to any person about

which the defendant did not know or have reason to know], that the

defendant willfully [facilitated] [allowed] [agreed to] the removal of the

vehicle from the scene of the accident before a law enforcement officer had

[completed the investigation of the accident] [authorized the removal of the

vehicle] (without jurisdiction or excuse), it would be your duty to return a

verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one

or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not

guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.62 (June 2006). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-166(c). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
92440f7652baf531c49655668c8aa88a5c7f44f4330d6e10d0f615f0f62c9160
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.