NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.62
REMOVAL OF VEHICLE FROM SCENE AFTER ACCIDENT RESULTING IN [DAMAGE TO PROPERTY] [[INJURY] [DEATH] TO ANY PERSON OF WHICH THE DRIVER WAS UNAWARE]— DRIVER. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with removal of a vehicle from the
scene of an accident resulting in [damage to property] [[injury] [death] to
any person about which the defendant did not know or have reason to
know].
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant was the driver of a vehicle that was involved
in a reportable accident. A reportable accident 1 is one involving a motor
vehicle that results in [death or injury of a human being] [total property
damage of one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more] [property damage of any
amount to a vehicle seized because it was driven by a person charged with
an offense involving impaired driving whose license was already revoked as
a result of a prior impaired driving offense].
Second, that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
that the vehicle was involved in an [accident] [collision] resulting in [damage
to property] [[injury] [death] to any person about which the defendant did
not know or have reason to know].
Third, that defendant willfully [facilitated] [allowed] [agreed to] the
removal of the vehicle from the scene of the accident (without justification
or excuse). 2
And Fourth, that a law enforcement officer had not [completed the
investigation of the accident] [authorized the removal of the vehicle].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was the driver of a vehicle that was
involved in a reportable accident, that the defendant knew or reasonably
should have known that the vehicle was involved in an [accident] [collision]
resulting in [damage to property] [[injury] [death] to any person about
which the defendant did not know or have reason to know], that the
defendant willfully [facilitated] [allowed] [agreed to] the removal of the
vehicle from the scene of the accident before a law enforcement officer had
[completed the investigation of the accident] [authorized the removal of the
vehicle] (without jurisdiction or excuse), it would be your duty to return a
verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one
or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not
guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.62 (June 2006). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-166(c). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
92440f7652baf531c49655668c8aa88a5c7f44f4330d6e10d0f615f0f62c9160
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.