NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.52
HIT AND RUN WITH SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR DEATH (DEFENDANT STOPPED BUT FAILED TO GIVE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND RENDER ASSISTANCE). MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with failing to give required
information and render assistance at the scene when the defendant was the
driver of a vehicle involved in a crash 1 which the defendant knew or should
have known resulted in [serious bodily injury 2] [death].
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove six things beyond a reasonable doubt:
3
First, that the defendant was driving a vehicle.
Second, that the vehicle was involved in a crash.
Third, that a person [suffered serious bodily injury in] [died as a result
of] this crash.
Fourth, that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
4
that the defendant was involved in a crash and that a person [suffered
serious bodily injury] [died as a result of] that crash. The defendant's
knowledge can be actual or implied—that is, it may be inferred where the
circumstances proven are such as would lead the defendant to believe that
the defendant had been in a crash which resulted in [serious bodily injury to]
5
[death of] a person.
Fifth, that the defendant stopped but did not
a. [give the defendant’s name, address, driver’s license number, and the
license plate number of the defendant’s vehicle to the [person struck]
6
[[driver] [occupant] of any other vehicle involved] and
b. [render reasonable assistance to the person injured if [it was apparent
that such assistance was necessary] [requested by the injured
person]].
And Sixth, that the defendant's failure was willful, that is, intentional
7
(and without justification or excuse. )
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was driving a vehicle that was involved
in a crash which resulted in [serious bodily injury to] [death of] a person,
that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the
defendant had been in that crash and that a person had [suffered serious
bodily injury] [died as a result of that crash], that the defendant stopped but
did not
a. [give the defendant’s name, address, driver's license number and the
license plate number of the defendant’s vehicle to the [person struck]
[[driver] [occupant] of any other vehicle involved] and
b. [render reasonable assistance to the person injured if [it was apparent
that this was necessary] [requested by the injured person]],
and that the defendant's failure to do so was willful (and without justification
or excuse), it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not
so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it
would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.52 (June 2009). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-166(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8f8c4b768f580bb9bc09009cea3af867fdcb4737d3465dd0b2e386a72f8b5e77
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.