Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.28C

FAILING THE [SAFETY] [EMISSIONS] INSPECTION OF A VEHICLE FOR AN UNLAWFUL REASON. FELONY.

activein force · 2017-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with failing the [safety]

[emissions] inspection of a vehicle for an unlawful reason.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that on or about the alleged date the defendant failed the

[safety] [emissions] inspection of a vehicle for an unlawful reason, by

(describe alleged unlawful reason, e.g. to require multiple inspections or

unnecessary repairs).

And Second, that the defendant did so knowingly.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant knowingly failed the [safety]

[emissions] inspection of a vehicle for an unlawful reason, then it would

be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.28C (June 2017). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-183.8(c)(5). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
54bce526b63bf0fc98752a7d35cec5c776656bfa508b30c13bad0a01f85ab3a8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 271.28C — FAILING THE [SAFETY] [EMISSI… · binding.law