Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.77

UNLAWFUL USE OF MOBILE PHONE TO [MANUALLY ENTER MULTIPLE LETTERS OR TEXT AS A MEANS OF COMMUNICATING WITH ANOTHER PERSON] [READ ANY [ELECTRONIC MAIL] [TEXT MESSAGE] [TRANSMITTED TO] [STORED WITHIN] THE DEVICE] WHILE OPERATING A SCHOOL BUS. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2010-06-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: This applies to offenses occurring on or after

December 1, 2009.

The defendant has been charged with unlawful use of a [mobile phone]

to [manually enter multiple letters or text in the device as a means of

communicating with another person] [[read any [electronic mail] [text

message] [transmitted to] [stored within] the device 3]] while [operating a

[[public] [private] school bus] [school activity bus]] [transporting students

for hire in (name vehicle)].

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was [operating a [school bus] [school activity

bus] [(name other vehicle)]] [transporting students for hire in (name

vehicle)] on a public [street] [highway] [vehicular area].

Second, that the defendant was using a [mobile telephone] to

[manually enter multiple letters or text in the device as a means of

communicating with another person] [read any [electronic mail] [text

message] [transmitted to] [stored within] the device]]

And Third, that the [school bus] [school activity bus] [(name other

vehicle)] was in motion.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant was operating a [school bus] [school

activity bus] [(name other vehicle)] on a public [street] [highway] [vehicular

area] while using a [mobile telephone] to [manually enter multiple letters or

text in the device as a means of communicating with another person] [[read

any [electronic mail] [text message] [transmitted to] [stored within] the

device] and that the [school bus] [school activity bus] [(name other

vehicle)] was in motion, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty.

If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these

things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.77 (Replacement June 2010). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-137.4A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
f2afa17cedaa565cc0124afb0fe48a2a2051ce3a38d12954989832df64c24d15
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.