NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.61A
UNSAFE MOVEMENT (BACKING) CAUSING [PROPERTY DAMAGE] [PERSONAL INJURY] TO MOTORCYCLE [OPERATOR] [PASSENGER]. INFRACTION.
The defendant has been charged with causing [property damage]
[personal injury] to a motorcycle [operator] [passenger].
For you to find the defendant responsible for this infraction, the
State must prove six things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant was the driver of a vehicle;
Second, that the vehicle was on a highway;
Third, that the defendant backed this vehicle and that this backing
could not be made with safety and without interfering with other traffic;
Fourth, that before backing this vehicle, the defendant did not see
that the movement could be made in safety; It is not required that the
circumstances be absolutely free from danger. In determining whether
the driver can back with safety, the driver has the right to assume, in the
absence of circumstances indicating the contrary, that other drivers will
exercise reasonable care to avoid colliding with the driver’s vehicle;
Fifth, that when the defendant backed this vehicle there was a
motorcycle operator who may be affected by this movement and
defendant caused this motorcycle operator to [change travel lanes] [leave
that portion of any highway designated as travel lanes];
And Sixth, that the defendant’s actions resulted in a crash causing
[property damage] [personal injury] to a motorcycle [operator]
[passenger].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant was the driver of a vehicle, that
the vehicle was on a highway, that the defendant backed this vehicle and
that this backing could not be made with safety and without interfering
with other traffic, that before backing this vehicle, the defendant did not
see that the movement could be made in safety, that when the
defendant backed this vehicle there was a motorcycle operator who may
be affected by this movement and defendant caused this motorcycle
operator to [change travel lanes] [leave that portion of any highway
designated as travel lanes], and that the defendant’s actions resulted in
a crash causing [property damage] [personal injury] to a motorcycle
[operator] [passenger], it would be your duty to return a verdict of
responsible. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one
or more of these things it would be your duty to return a verdict of not
responsible.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.61A (June 2014). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-154 (a1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
f5a5c1b5c7cae54df79c7ee6fe5993e78d6fcb7d10bdb4a51b74954a3eefdea3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.