Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.51

DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS. INFRACTION.

activein force · 2001-04-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with driving a vehicle at a speed

greater than was reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.

For you to find the defendant responsible for this infraction, the State

must prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant drove a vehicle upon a [highway] [public

vehicular area].

Second, that (state speed alleged to be greater than reasonable and

prudent) was greater than was reasonable and prudent under the conditions

then existing 1.

And Third, that the defendant drove at a speed of at least (state speed

alleged to be greater than reasonable and prudent).

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant drove a vehicle upon a [highway]

[public vehicular area] at a speed of at least (state speed) and (state speed)

was greater than was reasonable and prudent under the conditions then

existing, it would be your duty to return a verdict of responsible. If you do

not so find or have a reasonable doubt about one or more of these things, it

would be your duty to return a verdict of not responsible.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 270.51 (Replacement April 2001). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 10-141(a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
5f1b312940361ad022b7fa28bff9bde74802147621839d915c5d0deda7011eb6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.