NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.53
PSEUDOEPHEDRINE SALES-RETAILER WHO FAILS TO TRAIN EMPLOYEES.
The defendant has been charged with failing to train [his] [her]
employees in pseudoephedrine products sales.
For you to find the defendant responsible for this offense, the state
must prove two1 things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First that the defendant was a retailer;
And Second, that the defendant
a) [did not require that employees involved in the sale of
pseudoephedrine products be trained in a program conducted or approved
by the Legislative Commission on Methamphetamine Abuse]
b) [failed to adequately supervise employees in transactions
involving pseudoephedrine products]
c) [failed to reasonably discipline employees for violations of
North Carolina statutes and regulations].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date that the defendant was a retailer, [did not require
that employees involved in the sale of pseudoephedrine products be
trained in a program conducted or approved by the Legislative
Commission of Methamphetamine Abuse], [failed to adequately supervise
employees in transactions involving pseudoephedrine products], [failed to
reasonably discipline employees for violations of North Carolina statutes
and regulations], it would be your duty to find that the defendant is
responsible.
If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of
these things, then it would be your duty to find that the defendant is not
responsible.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.53 (June 2012). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 90-113.56, 90-113.55. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
51cf6d88af89f96e705deff4a0d31b6ef8d832fb58ba45c5776f046bb9ef7398
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.