NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.30
DISTRIBUTING OR TRANSPORTING URINE TO DEFRAUD A [DRUG] [ALCOHOL] TEST. MISDEMEANOR; FELONY.
NOTE WELL: See G.S. 15A-928 for provisions regarding
indictment, bifurcated trial, verdict and judgment.
The defendant has been charged with [selling] [giving away]
[distributing] [marketing] urine with the intent to defraud a [drug] [alcohol]
screening test.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [[sold] [gave away] [distributed] [marketed]
urine in North Carolina] [transported urine into North Carolina].
And Second, that the defendant intended that the urine be used to
defraud a [drug] [alcohol] screening test.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant [[sold] [gave away] [distributed]
[marketed] urine in North Carolina] [transported urine into North Carolina],
and that the defendant intended that the urine be used to defraud a [drug]
[alcohol] screening test, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If
you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these
things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.30 (Replacement April 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-401.20. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ae5c97926fb3d29b9ba954774f4a45f344b476c13182f7242a3ec5ee82868076
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.