Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.10

ADULTERATING A [URINE] [BODILY FLUID] SAMPLE WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD A [DRUG] [ALCOHOL] TEST. MISDEMEANOR; FELONY.

activein force · 2003-04-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: See G.S. 15A-928 for provisions regarding

indictment, bifurcated trial, verdict and judgment.

The defendant has been charged with adulterating a [urine] [bodily

fluid] sample with the intent to defraud a [drug] [alcohol] screening test.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant adulterated a [urine] [bodily fluid] sample.

And Second, that the defendant intended to defraud a [drug] [alcohol]

screening test.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant adulterated a [urine] [bodily fluid]

sample with the intent to defraud a [drug] [alcohol] screening test, then it

would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have

a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be your

duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.10 (Replacement April 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-401.20(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
215b30260e5e51f72b580a87aa32211edc89f67ce02bc4a9daa7f6265a319b6e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 261.10 — ADULTERATING A [URINE] [BODIL… · binding.law