NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 260.96B
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RESTRICTIONS ON SALES OF [GLASS TUBES] [SPLITTERS]. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with failure to comply with
restrictions on sales of [glass tubes]1 [splitters]2.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant is a [retailer] [retailer’s [agent]
[employee]]. Retailer means an individual or entity that is the general
owner of an establishment where glass tubes or splitters are available for
sale.
Second, that the defendant transferred a [glass tube] [splitter] to a
member of the public, with or without consideration.
And Third, that the defendant failed to
a) [Require the person to whom the [glass tube] [splitter] was
transferred to present identification that included a photograph and an
accurate depiction of the person and that also included the person’s name
and current address.]
b) [Enter the person’s name and current address on a record
maintained by the retailer.]
c) [Have the person sign their name, verifying that the glass tube
or splitter would not be used as drug paraphernalia in violation of the
criminal laws of the State of North Carolina.3]
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant was a [retailer] [retailer’s [agent]
[employee]], that the defendant transferred a [glass tube] [splitter] to a
member of the public, with or without consideration, and that the
defendant failed to
a) [require the person to whom the [glass tube] [splitter] was
transferred to present identification that includes a photograph and
is an accurate depiction of the person and that also includes the
person’s name and current address]
b) [enter the person’s name and current address on a record
maintained by the retailer]
c) [have the person sign their name, verifying that the glass tube
or splitter would not be used as drug paraphernalia in violation of
the criminal laws of the State of North Carolina]
it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or
if you have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it
would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 260.96B (June 2010). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.82(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
13ae0bc20950e796b8eb6fffd26811f4743f1bcd4d721cae6804d6b223e5fb2b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.