NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 260.87
FELONIOUS USE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES REPORTING SYSTEM FOR AN UNAUTHORIZED PURPOSE. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with feloniously using the
controlled substances reporting system for an unauthorized purpose.
For you to find the defendant guilty of using the controlled
substances reporting system for an unauthorized purpose, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt.
First, that the defendant was authorized to access data in the
controlled substances reporting system.1
Second, that defendant knowingly and intentionally accessed
prescription information in the reporting system.
And Third, that defendant accessed this information for an
unauthorized purpose.2 (Describe activity) would be an unauthorized
purpose.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was authorized to access the data
in the controlled substances reporting system, and that the defendant
knowingly and intentionally accessed this information for an unauthorized
purpose, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not
so find, or if you have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these
things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 260.87 (June 2019). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.74(k)(1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e3e161af3727d21146ffc83c0503ded9de6a126e9b20318a7aa007dbd4d11524
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.