NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.97
[COUNTERFEITING] [SELLING] [LENDING] [PERMITTING USE OF] PHOTO IDENTIFICATION FOR VOTING. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with [counterfeiting] [selling]
[lending] [permitting use of] photo identification for voting.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that defendant [counterfeited] [sold] [lent] [permitted the
use of] a form of photo identification1.
Second, that the person receiving this photo identification was not
entitled to its use.
And Third, that defendant [counterfeited] [sold] [lent] [permitted
the use of] this photo identification for the purposes of voting.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant [counterfeited] [sold] [lent]
[permitted the use of] a form of photo identification, to a person not
entitled to the use of the photo identification, and that the defendant
[counterfeited] [sold] [lent] [permitted the use of] this photo
identification for the purposes of voting, it would be your duty to return a
verdict of guilty. If you do not so find, or if you have a reasonable doubt
as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a
verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.97 (June 2019). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163A-1389(19). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
6f32b0bf5d5c643024bbfd05533c71a5de2f22b1dccf36e3e8e7c62336264a99
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.