Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.53

[AIDING] [ASSISTING] [PROCURING] [COUNSELING] [ADVISING] IN THE [PREPARATION] [PRESENTATION] [FILING] OF A [FRAUDULENT] [FALSE] TAX DOCUMENT BY A TAX RETURN PREPARER. FELONY.

activein force · 2016-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with willfully1 [aiding] [assisting]

[procuring] [counseling] [advising] the [preparation] [presentation] [filing]

of a [fraudulent] [false] tax document.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant pursuant to or in connection with the revenue

laws willfully [aided] [assisted in] [procured] [counseled] [advised] the

[preparation] [presentation] [filing] of a(n) [return] [affidavit] [claim]

[(describe other document)];

Second, that the defendant knew this document was [fraudulent]

[false] as to any material matter, whether or not the [falsity] [fraud] was

with the [knowledge] [consent] of the person [authorized] [required] to

[present] [[file the [return] [affidavit] [claim] [(describe other document)]];

Third, that the defendant was an income tax return preparer2;

And Fourth, that the amount of all taxes evaded on returns filed in the

taxable year (describe taxable year, e.g. 2015) was [one hundred thousand

dollars ($100,000) or more] [less than one hundred thousand dollars

($100,000)]3.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant pursuant to or in connection with the

revenue laws willfully [aided] [assisted in] [procured] [counseled] [advised]

the [preparation] [presentation] [filing] of a(n) [return] [affidavit] [claim]

[(describe other document)], that the defendant knew this document was

[fraudulent] [false] as to any material matter, whether or not the [falsity]

[fraud] was with the [knowledge] [consent] of the person [authorized]

[required] to [present] [[file the [return] [affidavit] [claim] [(describe other

document)]], that the defendant was an income tax return preparer, and

that the amount of all taxes evaded on returns filed in the taxable year

(describe taxable year) was [one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or

more] [less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000)], it would be

your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be your

duty to return a verdict of not guilty.4

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.53 (Replacement June 2016). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-236 (a)(9a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
25c6f09da6cd53895f15eb74ad9cf5c6549f0d922a9b6689d586627890225ed1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.