NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.43
[BANK] [OFFICER] [DIRECTOR] [EMPLOYEE] MAKING EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO A DISQUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with making an extension of credit
to a disqualified individual.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that defendant was a(n) [bank] [[officer] [director] [affiliate]
of a bank];
And Second, that the defendant [made an extension of credit]
[granted a gratuity] to [[the Commissioner] [a deputy commissioner] of
banks] [a bank examiner].1
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was a(n) [bank] [[officer] [director]
[affiliate] of a bank] and that the defendant [made an extension of
credit] [granted a gratuity] to [[the Commissioner] [a deputy
commissioner] of banks] [a bank examiner], it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt
as to one or more of these things, then it would be your duty to return a
verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.43 (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 53C-8-9. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c9624ca5ae8b75afc21f11bef0e150ebbb5e1c4d41b5cc508697c9a447b027a6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.