N.C.P.I.—Crim. 259.40

The defendant has been charged with making a false report as a

bank examiner.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that defendant was a bank examiner;

And Second, that the defendant

a) [knowingly and willfully made a [false] [fraudulent] report of the

condition of (name bank) that the examiner had examined with

the intent to [aid] [abet] the [bank] [bank’s affiliates] in

committing (describe conduct in violation of Chapter 53 of

General Statutes)]

b) [[kept] [accepted] a [bribe] [gratuity] given for the purpose of

inducing the examiner not to file a report of examination of

(name bank)]

c) [neglected to make an examination of (name bank) by reason of

having [received] [accepted] a [bribe] [gratuity]].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was a bank examiner and that the

defendant

a) [knowingly and willfully made a [false] [fraudulent] report of the

condition of (name bank) that the examiner had examined with

the intent to [aid] [abet] the [bank] [bank’s affiliates] in

committing (describe conduct in violation of Chapter 53 of

General Statutes)]

b) [[kept] [accepted] a [bribe] [gratuity] given for the purpose of

inducing the examiner not to file a report of examination of

(name bank)]

c) [neglected to make an examination of (name bank) by reason of

having [received] [accepted] a [bribe] [gratuity]],

it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or

have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would

be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.