Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 258.32

ERECTING OR MAINTAINING COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING SIGNS IN HIGHWAY RIGHTS OF WAY. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2012-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with [erecting] [maintaining] upon

a highway right of way any [traffic sign] [highway sign] [signal] bearing

any commercial advertising, except those that are permitted.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant [erected] [maintained] upon a highway

right of way any [traffic sign] [highway sign] [signal] bearing any

commercial advertising;

And Second, that the [traffic sign] [highway sign] [signal] bearing

any commercial advertising was placed [[without the permission of any

property owner of a [residence] [business] [religious institution] fronting

the right of way where the sign was erected]]1 [on a right of way of a

fully controlled access highway] [closer than three feet from the edge of

the pavement of the road] [so that it obscured motorist visibility at an

intersection] [so that it was higher than 42 inches above the edge of the

pavement of the road] [so that it was larger than 864 square inches] [so

that it obscured or replaced another sign.]2

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant [erected] [maintained] upon any

highway right of way any [traffic sign] [highway sign] [signal] bearing any

commercial advertising and that the [traffic sign] [highway sign] [signal]

was placed [[without the permission of any property owner of a

[residence] [business] [religious institution] fronting the right of way

where the sign was erected]] [on a right of way of a fully controlled

access highway] [closer than three feet from the edge of the pavement of

the road] [so that it obscured motorist visibility at an intersection] [so

that it was higher than 42 inches above the edge of the pavement of the

road] [so that it was larger than 864 square inches] [so that it obscured

or replaced another sign], it would be your duty to return a verdict of

guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or

more of these things, then it would be your duty to return a verdict of not

guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 258.32 (June 2012). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-32 (a), (d). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d14a9e5034877bfe32b1c41fecc068d9fe31787639d95e03ea87c1508278bce9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.