NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 240.76
DOMESTIC NEGLECT OF A [DISABLED] [ELDER] ADULT INFLICTING SERIOUS [MENTAL] [PHYSICAL] INJURY. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with Domestic Neglect of a
[Disabled] [Elder] Adult Inflicting Serious [Mental] [Physical] Injury.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove six things beyond a reasonable doubt.
First, that the defendant was a caretaker of the alleged victim. A
caretaker is a person who has the responsibility for the care of a
[disabled] [elder] adult as a result of family relationship or who has
assumed the responsibility for the care of a [disabled] [elder] adult
[voluntarily] [by contract.]
Second, that the alleged victim was a [disabled] [elder] adult. [A
disabled adult is a person eighteen years of age or older, who is present
in the State of North Carolina, and who is [physically] [mentally]
incapacitated due to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism,
organic brain damage, caused by advanced age or other physical
degeneration in connection therewith, or due to conditions incurred at any
age which are the result of [accident] [organic brain damage] [[mental]
[physical] illness] [continued consumption or absorption of substances.]
[An elder adult is a person sixty years of age or older who is not able to
provide for the social, medical, psychiatric, psychological, financial or
legal services necessary to safeguard the person’s rights and resources to
maintain the person’s physical and mental well-being.]
Third, that the alleged victim was residing in a domestic setting. A
domestic setting is any residential setting except for a health care facility
or residential care facility.
Fourth, that the defendant committed domestic neglect of a
[disabled] [elder] adult in that he [failed to provide [medical] [hygienic]
care to the alleged victim] [[confined] [restrained] the alleged victim]. To
[confine] [restrain] is to imprison or restrict the freedom of movement of
the alleged victim, in a place or under a condition that was cruel or
unsafe.
Fifth, that in doing so the defendant acted [wantonly] [recklessly]
[with gross carelessness].
And Sixth, as a result, the alleged victim suffered a serious
[mental] [physical] injury.1
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant was a caretaker of the alleged
victim, the alleged victim was a [disabled] [elder] adult, the alleged
victim was residing in a domestic setting, that the defendant [failed to
provide [medical] [hygienic] care to the alleged victim] [[confined]
[restrained] the alleged victim [in a place] [under a condition] that was
unsafe], and in doing so the defendant acted [wantonly] [recklessly]
[with gross carelessness] and the alleged victim suffered a serious
[mental] [physical] injury, it would be your duty to return a verdict of
guilty of Domestic Neglect of a [Disabled] [Elder] Adult Inflicting Serious
[Mental] [Physical] Injury. If you do not so find or have a reasonable
doubt as to one or more of these things, you would not return a verdict of
guilty, but consider whether the defendant is guilty of Neglect of a
[Disabled] [Elder] Adult Inflicting [Mental] [Physical] Injury. This latter
offense differs from the former in that the [mental] [physical] injury need
not be serious.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant was a caretaker of the alleged
victim, the alleged victim was a [disabled] [elder] adult, the alleged
victim was residing in a domestic setting, that the defendant [failed to
provide [medical] [hygienic] care to the alleged victim] [[confined]
[restrained] the alleged victim [in a place] [under a condition] that was
unsafe], and in doing so the defendant acted [wantonly] [recklessly]
[with gross carelessness] and the alleged victim suffered a [mental]
[physical] injury, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you
do not so find, or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these
things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 240.76 (June 2015). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-32.3. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c5682743c802ad6e54787567558c2ee1b8e7cba3edcde36d4d8b2c112ae5ec2a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.