Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 240.05

ABANDONMENT BY SUPPORTING SPOUSE. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2000-05-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: This crime is punished as a Class 1 misdemeanor

upon a second or subsequent offense. G.S. 14-322(f).

The defendant has been charged with abandonment of [his wife] [her

husband].

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove six things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was the [husband] [wife] of (name

defendant's spouse).

Second, that the defendant was a supporting spouse. A supporting

spouse is a spouse, whether husband or wife, upon whom the other spouse

is actually substantially dependent or from whom such other spouse is

substantially in need of maintenance and support.

Third, that (name defendant's spouse) was a dependent spouse. A

dependent spouse is a spouse, whether husband or wife, who is actually

substantially dependent upon the other spouse for [his] [her] maintenance

and support or is substantially in need of maintenance and support from the

other spouse.

Fourth, that the defendant abandoned (name defendant's spouse) on

or about (name date). Abandonment means more than mere separation.

Fifth, that after abandoning [her] [him], [he] [she] failed to provide

[her] [him] with adequate support. By support, I mean such things as food,

clothing, a place to live, or medical attention reasonably required for the

preservation of [her] [his] health. What was adequate support depends on

the property, if any, the defendant owned, [his] [her] earnings (and other

income), if any, and [his] [her] ability to earn.

And Sixth, that both the abandonment and failure to support was

willful, that is, intentional and without justification or excuse.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant was a supporting spouse, that (name

defendant's spouse) was a dependent spouse, that the defendant willfully

abandoned [his wife] [her husband], and that thereafter [he] [she] willfully

failed to provide [her] [him] with adequate support, it would be your duty to

return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as

to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of

not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 240.05 (Replacement May 2000). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-322(b). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
39606aeec15e730abb7db3a1e707bb46b2a0d1f767c5433d6b1b4d751628ed25
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.