Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.97

DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN [FOOD] [BEVERAGE]–NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES; MILD PHYSICAL DISCOMFORT. FELONY.

activein force · 2020-06-01 – presentas-observed

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove

three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant knowingly [distributed] [sold] [gave away]

[caused to be placed in a position of human [accessibility][ingestion]] any

[food] [beverage] (or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance].

Second, at the time that the [food] [beverage] (or other) [[eatable]

[drinkable] substance] was [distributed] [sold] [given away] [caused to be

placed in a position of human [accessibility][ingestion]] that the defendant

knew the food contained any noxious or deleterious substance, material or

article that might be injurious to a person's health or might cause a person

any physical discomfort.

And Third, the [actual effect on a person eating the [food] [beverage]

(or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance] was limited to mild physical

discomfort without any lasting effect] [the possible effect on a person eating

the [food] [beverage] (or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance] would be

limited to mild physical discomfort without any lasting effect].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant knowingly [distributed] [sold] [gave

away] [caused to be placed in a position of human [accessibility][ingestion]]

any [food][beverage] (or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance], knowing

the [food] [beverage] (or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance] contained

any noxious or deleterious substance, material or article that might be

injurious to a person's health or might cause a person any physical discomfort,

and the [actual effect on a person eating the [food] [beverage] (or other)

[[eatable] [drinkable] substance] was limited to mild physical discomfort

without any lasting effect] [the possible effect on a person eating the [food]

[beverage] (or other) [[eatable] [drinkable] substance] would be limited to

mild physical discomfort without any lasting effect], it would be your duty to

return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as

to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not

guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.97 (Replacement June 2020). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-401.11. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
99253ded96fca9a8e945ccfd0a3bd5f635382830509be813578a133447407973
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.97 — DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN [FOOD… · binding.law