NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.90
FELONIOUS UNAUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATION OF MEDICATION TO A CHILD. FELONY; MISDEMEANOR.
NOTE WELL: Use this instruction for offenses occurring on or
after December 1, 2003.
The defendant has been charged with felonious unauthorized
administration of medication to a child. For the defendant to be found guilty
of this offense, the State must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant administered [prescription] [over the counter]
medication to a child attending a child care facility. 1
Second, that at the time the defendant administered the medication he
was an [employee] [owner] [household member] [volunteer] [operator] of
the [licensed] [unlicensed] child care facility that the child was attending.
Third, that the defendant acted willfully and without written
authorization 2 in administering the medication.
And Fourth, that serious injury resulted to the child.
NOTE WELL: Subsection (b] of the statute states that in the
event of an emergency medical condition and the child's parent
or guardian is unavailable, it shall not be unlawful to administer
medication to a child attending the child care facility without
written authorization as required under subsection (a] of this
section if the medication is administered with the authorization
and in accordance with instructions from a bona fide medical
care provider. For purposes of this subsection, the following
definitions apply:
1) A bona fide medical care provider means an individual who
is licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized to prescribe
the medication.
2) An emergency medical condition means circumstances
where a prudent layperson acting reasonably would have
believed that an emergency medical condition existed.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant willfully and without written
authorization administered [prescription] [over the counter] medication to a
child attending a child care facility, that at the time the defendant
administered the medication he was an [employee] [owner] [household
member] [volunteer] [operator] of the [licensed] [unlicensed] child care
facility that the child was attending, and that serious injury resulted to the
child, then it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty of felonious
unauthorized administration of medication to a child. If you do not so find, or
have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, you will not
return a verdict of guilty of this offense 3 but will consider whether the
defendant is guilty of misdemeanor unauthorized administration of
medication to a child.
Misdemeanor administration of medication to a child differs from the
felony in that the unauthorized administration of medication need not result
in serious injury to the child.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant willfully and without written
authorization administered [prescription] [over the counter] medication to a
child attending a child care facility and that at the time the defendant
administered the medication he was an [employee] [owner] [household
member] [volunteer] [operator] of the [licensed] [unlicensed] child care
facility that the child was attending, it would be your duty to return a verdict
of guilty of misdemeanor unauthorized administration of medication to a
child. If you do not so find, or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of
these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.90 (April 2004). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 110-102.1A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
fcb5a2a976efc29ab3375c678b6c1efacdee970bf41189c13fcef630b9400e56
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.