Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.55C

FELONIOUS CHILD ABUSE (RECKLESS DISREGARD-SERIOUS BODILY INJURY). FELONY; MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2014-06-01 – presentas-observed

NOTE WELL: Use N.C.P.I.-Crim. 239.55D if serious

physical injury is alleged.

The defendant has been charged with felonious child abuse by

reckless disregard for human life in the care of a child resulting in serious

bodily injury.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant was [the parent of] [[a person providing

[care to] [supervision of]]1 the child.

Second, that at that time the child had not yet reached the child’s

sixteenth birthday.

Third, that the defendant:

a) willfully (describe conduct)2; or

b) willfully (describe conduct) which amounted to a grossly

negligent omission. A grossly negligent omission is a wanton

omission done with conscious or reckless disregard for the

rights and safety of others.3

Fourth, that the defendant’s [willful conduct] [grossly negligent

omission] resulted in serious bodily injury to the child. Serious bodily

injury is bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that

causes permanent disfigurement, a coma, a permanent or protracted

condition that causes extreme pain, or permanent or protracted loss or

impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ, or that results

in prolonged hospitalization.

And Fifth, that the defendant’s [willful conduct] [grossly negligent

omission] in the care of the child was a reckless disregard for human life.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was [the parent of] [[a person

providing [care for] [supervision of]] the child and that the child had not

reached the child’s sixteenth birthday, and that the defendant’s [willful

act] [grossly negligent omission] in the care of the child was a reckless

disregard for human life and resulted in serious bodily injury to the child,

it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty.

If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more

of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.55C (June 2014). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-318.4(a4), 14-318.2. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
1b2e3859c61b1aca82922311962d55fe1a5b1aa6ba306861a430a7ff613aa877
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.