Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.30

CHILD CARE FACILITY REPORT OF MISSING CHILD.

activein force · 2013-10-01 – presentas-observed

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt.

First, that the defendant was a(n) [operator]1 [staff]2 [any adult

person] with the approval of the care provider in a child care facility.3

Second, that the defendant learned that a child4, which was in their

[care] [presence], was missing.

Third, that the defendant did not immediately report the missing

child to law enforcement.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was a(n) [operator] [staff] [any

adult person] with the approval of the care provider in a child care

facility, the defendant learned that a child in their [care] [presence] was

missing, and that the defendant did not immediately report the missing

child to law enforcement, it would be your duty to return a verdict of

guilty. If you do not find so or if you have a reasonable doubt as to one

or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not

guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.30 (October 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 110-102.1(a). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
32b0e33dad9d167b9d703ee6d4971fbe7ce5a6b7195c540c8f6315803b97dab0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 239.30 — CHILD CARE FACILITY REPORT OF… · binding.law