NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.90
UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF GAME TERMINAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF [PROMOTING] [OPERATING] [CONDUCTING] A SERVER-BASED ELECTRONIC GAME PROMOTION. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with possession of a game terminal
with a display that simulates a game ordinarily played on a [slot machine]
[video gaming machine 1] for the purpose of [promoting] [operating]
[conducting] a server-based electronic game promotion 2.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant possessed a game terminal with a display
that simulates a game ordinarily played on a [slot machine] [video gaming
machine].
And Second, that the defendant did so for the purpose of [promoting]
[operating] [conducting] a server-based electronic game promotion.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant possessed a game terminal with a
display that simulates a game ordinarily played on a [slot machine] [video
gaming machine] and that the defendant did so for the purpose of
[promoting] [operating] [conducting] a server-based electronic game
promotion, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not
so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it
would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.90 (June 2009). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-306.3(B). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d9d029be76bf0968975f5b73463cbb4ecde5ff77b65ab1734d7a522aa1821800
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.