NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.70
UNLAWFUL [OPERATION] [POSSESSION] OF VIDEO GAMING MACHINES. FELONY; MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with [operating] [allowing to be
operated] [placing into operation] [keeping in his possession for the
purpose of operating] (a) video gaming machine(s).1
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [[operated] [allowed to be operated]
[placed in operation] [kept in his possession for the purpose of
operating]] [[one or more] [more than one] [more than two] [five or
more]]2 video gaming machine(s).3
And Second, that the defendant did so at one location.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant [[operated] [allowed to be
operated] [placed in operation] [kept in his possession for the purpose of
operating]] [[one or more] [more than one] [more than two] [five or
more]] video gaming machine(s) at one location, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable
doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a
verdict of not guilty.
NOTEWELL: For a first conviction under this section,
the defendant shall be guilty of a Class 1
misdemeanor. A second offense will be punished as a
Class H felony. A third or subsequent offense will be
punished as a Class G felony. See N.C. Gen. Stat. §
14-309(a).
If there is evidence to support a charge on a previous
conviction and the defendant denies a previous
conviction or remains silent, then this instruction
should be amended to add the third element that
follows. If the defendant admits the previous
convictions, this element would not be added. See
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-928 for provisions regarding
indictment, bifurcated trial, verdict and judgment. The
mandate should be amended in keeping with this
addition.
And Third, that at the time the defendant [operated] [allowed
to be operated] [placed in operation] [kept in his possession
for the purpose of operating] the video gaming machine(s),
the defendant had been convicted of the following [one] [two
or more] offenses:
(1) On (name date), the defendant in (name court)
[was convicted of] [plead guilty to] the offense of [operating]
[allowing to be operated] [placing in operation] [keeping in
his possession for the purpose of operating] [[one or more]
[more than one] [more than two]] video gaming machines,
that was committed on (name date); and
(2) On (name date), the defendant in (name court)
[was convicted of] [plead guilty to] the offense of [operating]
[allowing to be operated] [placing in operation] [keeping in
his possession for the purpose of operating] [[one or more]
[more than one] [more than two]] video gaming machines,
that was committed on (name date); and
(3) On (name date), the defendant in (name court)
[was convicted of] [plead guilty to] the offense of [operating]
[allowing to be operated] [placing in operation] [keeping in
his possession for the purpose of operating] [[one or more]
[more than one] [more than two]] video gaming machines,
that was committed on (name date).
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.70 (June 2007). N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 14-306.1; 14-306.1A. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
bc91e7fd5520168bfa97de1fd0c7b94146442d68552604df8aa27b7c234e3dac
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.