NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.58
WILLFULLY [FURNISHING] [SUPPLYING] [OTHERWISE GIVING] FALSE INFORMATION ON AN ADVANCED DEPOSIT WAGERING (ADW) LICENSE APPLICATION. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with willfully [furnishing] [supplying]
[otherwise giving] false information on an advanced deposit wagering (ADW)
license application.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove
two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant applied to become an advanced deposit
wagering (ADW) licensee.1
And Second, that the defendant willfully [furnished] [supplied]
[otherwise gave] false information on the license application.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, that the defendant applied to become an advanced
deposit wagering (ADW) licensee and that the defendant willfully [furnished]
[supplied] [otherwise gave] false information on the license application, it
would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have
a reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.58 (May 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 18C-1020(d). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c36d7a72d997b8ca9db9bcfc43bebbb21841105ae5d6747dbc5203e785de9aa3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.