NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.53
KNOWINGLY ATTEMPTING TO [SUBORN] [COLLUDE] [OTHERWISE CONSPIRE] TO INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF [ANY COMPETITION] [ASPECT OF ANY COMPETITION] THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF SPORTS WAGERING. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with knowingly attempting to [suborn]
[collude] [otherwise conspire] to influence the outcome of [any competition]
[aspect of any competition] that is the subject of sports wagering.1
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must prove
two things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant attempted to [suborn] [collude] [otherwise
conspire] to influence the outcome of [any competition] [aspect of any
competition] that is the subject of sports wagering.2
And Second, that the defendant did so knowingly.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant knowingly [attempted to [suborn]
[collude] [otherwise conspire] to influence the outcome of [any competition]
[aspect of any competition] that is the subject of sports wagering, it would be
your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would be your duty to
return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 237.53 (May 2024). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 18C-918(c). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
5d69f4964c57a9cba5e893dad4847fac35e26220ccb5b4bd249bb7052ebec180
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.