NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.69
FELONIOUS DISCLOSURE OF PRIVATE IMAGES BY OFFENDER UNDER THE AGE OF 18. FELONY.
NOTE WELL: This instruction should be used for a
second or subsequent offense committed by a person
who is under the age of 18 at the time of the offense.
NOTE WELL: Use this instruction only if the defendant
denies a previous conviction under N.C. Gen. Stat. §
14-190.5(c)(2) or remains silent. If the defendant
admits previous conviction, use N.C.P.I. 235.65, the
misdemeanor offense. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-928
for provisions regarding indictment, bifurcated trial,
verdict, and judgment. See also N.C.P.I. Crim. 204.05
for a model instruction for bifurcated proceedings.
NOTE WELL: This instruction applies for offenses
committed before December 1, 2017. For offenses
committed on or after December 1, 2017 use N.C.P.I.–
Crim. 235.69A.
The defendant has been charged with the felonious disclosure of
private images.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove seven things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that on or about the alleged date the defendant on (name
date) intentionally1 disclosed an image2 of another person with the
intent to [coerce] [harass] [intimidate] [demean] [humiliate] [cause
financial loss to] the depicted person.
Second, that the defendant on (name date of offense) was under
the age of 18.
Third, that the depicted person is identifiable from the [disclosed
image] [information offered in connection with the image].
Fourth, the disclosed image shows the [depicted person’s intimate
parts3 exposed] [depicted person engaged in sexual conduct3]
Fifth, that the defendant disclosed the image without the
affirmative consent of the depicted person.
Sixth, that the defendant disclosed the image under circumstances
such that the defendant [knew] [should have known] that the depicted
person had a reasonable expectation of privacy4.
And Seventh, that the defendant has a prior conviction for
misdemeanor disclosure of private images; that is:
On (name date) in (name court) the defendant [was convicted of]
[pled guilty to] misdemeanor disclosure of private images, that was
committed on (name date), in violation of the law of the State of North
Carolina.5
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, that on or
about the alleged date the defendant intentionally disclosed an image of
another person with the intent to [coerce] [harass] [intimidate] [demean]
[humiliate] [cause financial loss to] the depicted person, that defendant
on (name date of offense) was under the age of 18, that the depicted
person is identifiable from the [disclosed image] [information offered in
connection with the image], that the disclosed image shows the
[depicted person’s intimate parts exposed] [depicted person engaged in
sexual conduct], that the defendant disclosed the image without the
affirmative consent of the depicted person, that the defendant disclosed
the image under circumstances such that the defendant [knew] [should
have known] that the depicted person had a reasonable expectation of
privacy, and that defendant had previously been convicted of
misdemeanor disclosure of private images, then it would be your duty to
return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt
as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a
verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.69 (Replacement June 2018). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.5(b),(c)(3). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ec64a76c639232cccab3fe8066a9af9f50c1a28975731df104aa1a32f4f9f4e5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.