Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.30

POINTING A LASER DEVICE TOWARDS AN AIRCRAFT. FELONY

activein force · 2006-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with pointing a laser device at an

aircraft.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, the defendant willfully pointed a laser1 device at an aircraft2,

while the laser device was emitting a laser beam.

And Second, the laser beam was emitted while the aircraft was

[taking off] [landing] [in flight] [in motion].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully pointed a laser device at

an aircraft, while the device was emitting a laser beam and while the

aircraft was [taking off] [landing] [in flight] [in motion], it would be your

duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or both of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.30 (June 2006). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-280.2. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
245cd01913d81c820d648633d859f4a216c20e31180f9c513e976299fd6beb2a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.