NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.15
CARRYING WEAPONS INTO ASSEMBLIES. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with carrying a [gun] [rifle] [pistol]
into an assembly where a fee has been charged for admission thereto.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant attended (describe assembly, e.g., the old
time fiddler's convention).
Second, that a fee was charged for admission to (describe assembly).
And Third, that the defendant carried a [gun] [rifle] [pistol] into
(describe assembly).
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant attended (describe assembly), for
which an admission fee was charged, and that the defendant carried a [gun]
[rifle] [pistol] into (describe assembly), it would be your duty to return a
verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or if you have a reasonable doubt as
to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of
not guilty.
NOTE WELL: By virtue of subsection (b), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-
269.3 does not apply to the following: (1) on duty military
personnel or law enforcement officers carrying weapons as part
of their duties and certain off duty law enforcement officers
(See, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-269, incorporated by reference in
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-269.3(b)); (2) the owner or lessee of the
premises; (3) a person participating in the event if the
defendant is carrying the weapon with the permission of the
owner, lessee or person or organization sponsoring the event;
(4) a person registered or hired as a security guard by the
owner, lessee or person or organization sponsoring the event;
(5) a person carrying a handgun if the person has a valid
concealed handgun permit issued in accordance with Article 54B
of this Chapter, has a concealed handgun permit considered
valid under G.S. 14-415.24, or is exempt from obtaining a
permit pursuant to G.S. 14-415.25. This subdivision shall not be
construed to permit a person to carry a handgun on any
premises where the person in legal possession or control of the
premises has posted a conspicuous notice prohibiting the
carrying of a concealed handgun on the premises in accordance
with G.S. 14-415.11(c). If there is evidence that one of these
exceptions may apply to the defendant, instruct as follows:
If the defendant was [(describe type of military or law enforcement
officer, using appropriate language from N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-269)] [the
owner or lessee of the premises] [participating in the event and carrying the
[gun] [rifle] [pistol] with the permission of the [owner] [lessee] [person or
organization sponsoring the event]] [a person registered or hired as a
security guard by the [owner] [lessee] [person or organization sponsoring
the event]] [a person carrying a handgun if the person [has a valid
concealed handgun permit in accordance with Article 54B of this Chapter]
[has a concealed handgun permit considered valid under G.S. 14-415.24] [is
exempt from obtaining a permit pursuant to G.S. 14-415.25]], the statute
does not apply and the defendant is not guilty. If you find that the defendant
was (describe defendant's status), it would be your duty to return a verdict
of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 235.15 (June 2014). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-269.3. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
13e8117aff4821e899bd9de557e086ec3104f532849c21f50152e7949f3db986
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.