Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 230.81

HARASSMENT OF A PARTICIPANT IN A NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME WATCH PROGRAM. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2007-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with harassing a participant in a

neighborhood crime watch program.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant willfully [threatened] [intimidated]

another person.

Second, that the person [threatened] [intimidated] was [an

identifiable member of a neighborhood crime watch program] [a resident

in the same household as the member of a neighborhood crime watch

program].

And Third, that the defendant [threatened] [intimidated] the person

for the purpose of [intimidating] [retaliating] against that person for the

person's participation in a neighborhood crime watch program.

And Fourth, that at the time the person was [threatened]

[intimidated] the person was [traveling to or from a neighborhood crime

watch meeting] [actively participating in a neighborhood crime watch

program activity] [actively participating in an ongoing criminal

investigation].

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully [threatened] [intimidated]

another person, that the other person was [an identifiable member of a

neighborhood crime watch program] [a resident in the same household as

a member of a neighborhood crime watch program], that the defendant

threatened this person for the purpose of [intimidating] [retaliating]

against that person for the person's participation in a neighborhood crime

watch program, and that at the time the person was [threatened]

[intimidated] the person was [traveling to or from a neighborhood crime

watch meeting] [actively participating in a neighborhood crime watch

program activity][actively participating in an ongoing criminal

investigation], it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you

do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these

things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 230.81 (June 2007). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-226.2. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
7dad8122a0f09c534e7c3b06f4097057ab964ccf9690c25aff345c2c22923272
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 230.81 — HARASSMENT OF A PARTICIPANT I… · binding.law