NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 228.10
PERJURY. FELONY.
The defendant has been charged with perjury.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant testified 1 at (describe proceedings, e.g.,
"the trial of John Jones in Wake County Superior Court for burglary").
Second, that at that time the defendant was under [oath]
[affirmation].
Third, that the testimony was false. In order to find that the
testimony was false, the State must satisfy you of its falsity beyond a
reasonable doubt by the testimony of [two witnesses, each of whom you
must find to be believable] (or) [a witness plus other supporting
evidence, all of which you must find to be believable].2
Fourth, that the testimony was material,3 that is, that it tended to
mislead the [jury] [court]4 in regard to a significant issue of fact.
Testimony is material when it is so connected with the fact directly in
issue as to have a legitimate tendency to prove or disprove such fact.5
And Fifth, that the defendant acted willfully and corruptly, that is,
made the false statement knowingly, purposely and designedly.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant, while under [oath] [affirmation],
willfully and corruptly testified that (describe testimony), that this
testimony was material, and further find beyond a reasonable doubt from
the testimony of [two believable witnesses] (or) [a believable witness
plus other believable supporting evidence]6 that the defendant's
testimony was false, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If
you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these
things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE
_________________COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA)
)
) SPECIAL VERDICT
v. )
) AS TO JURISDICTION
)
_____________________ )
Defendant
We the jury return the unanimous special verdict as follows:
_______ North Carolina HAS jurisdiction to try the
defendant
_______ North Carolina DOES NOT have jurisdiction to try
the defendant.
This ____ day of ___________, 19__.
___________________________(signature)
Foreman of Jury
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 228.10 (January 2001). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-209. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
14ddc1aa438d009814b25905895f0fce2d11c4dd650da1b94ddf38bce4cefbf0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.