NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.92
PATRONIZING A PROSTITUTE. FELONY.
NOTE WELL: If the defendant admits to the prior
conviction, that element of the offense is established
and no evidence in support thereof may be adduced by
the State. In such a case, a transcript of plea is
required for the admission of this conviction. In this
situation, this instruction would not be used and
instead the jury should be charged on the underlying
misdemeanor using N.C.P.I.-Crim 226.91. If the
defendant denies the prior conviction or remains silent,
the State must prove this prior conviction in the
element of the offense charged before the jury as part
of its case.
The defendant has been charged with patronizing a prostitute.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt.
First, that the defendant willfully:
(a) [Engaged in [vaginal intercourse] [(describe) sexual act]
[(describe) sexual contact] for the purpose of sexual [arousal]
[gratification] with a prostitute. A prostitute is a person who engages in
the [[performance of] [offer of] [agreement to perform]] [vaginal
intercourse] [a sexual act] [sexual contact] for the purpose of sexual
[arousal] [gratification] for [money] [other consideration]. A sexual act is
cunnilingus, fellatio, analingus, or anal intercourse, but does not include
vaginal intercourse. Sexual act also means the penetration, however
slight, by any object into the genital or anal opening of another person's
body. Sexual contact is (i) touching of the sexual organ, anus, breast,
groin, or buttocks of any person, (ii) a touching of another person with a
sexual organ, anus, breast, groin, or buttocks, or (iii) ejaculation,
emission, or placing semen, urine, or feces upon any part of another
person.]
(b) [[Entered] [remained] in a place of prostitution with the intent
to engage in [vaginal intercourse] [a sexual act] [sexual contact] for the
purposes of sexual [arousal] [gratification].]
Second, that the defendant performed the act with a person who
was not the defendant’s spouse.
And Third, that on (name date), the defendant in (name court) [was
convicted of] [pled guilty to] the crime of patronizing a prostitute, that
was committed on (name date) in violation of the [State of North
Carolina] [State of (name other state)] [United States].
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant [willfully engaged in [vaginal
intercourse] [a sexual act] [sexual contact] for the purpose of [sexual
arousal] [gratification] with a prostitute] [willfully [entered] [remained] in
a place of prostitution with the intent to engage in [vaginal intercourse]
[a sexual act] [sexual contact] for the purposes of sexual [arousal]
[gratification]], that the act was performed with a person not the
defendant’s spouse, and the defendant had [been convicted of] [pled
guilty to] (name prior offense), it would be your duty to return a verdict
of guilty. If you do not so find or if you have a reasonable doubt as to
one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict of
not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.92 (June 2014). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-205.2. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e74e8385c01f935a026a2307595bfef8b89491d98aa1fa20959bd1acbdd13b18
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.