NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.75A
SECRETLY PEEPING THROUGH THE USE OF A MIRROR OR OTHER DEVICE. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with secretly peeping through the use
of a mirror or other device.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must
prove six things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant peeped; that is intentionally looked slyly or
surreptitiously.
Second, that the peeping was done secretly.
Third, that the defendant peeped [underneath] (or) [through] the
clothing being worn by another person.
Fourth, that the defendant used a [mirror] [(name other device)].
Fifth, that the defendant acted for the purpose of viewing the body of,
or the undergarments worn by, the other person.
And Sixth, that the defendant acted without the consent of the other
person.
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date, the defendant, using a [mirror] [(name other
device)], secretly peeped [underneath] (or) [through] the clothing being
worn by another person and acted without the consent of the other person
and for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by
the other person, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you
do not so find or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things,
it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.75A (Replacement February 2005). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202(a1). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
b60a7ad2ba009007e4d186bb19000ff676fef447f1956ba2ec479be190a36d8e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.