Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.72E

CYBER-BULLYING OF SCHOOL EMPLOYEE BY STUDENT-ELECTRONIC MAILING LISTS. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2013-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with the cyber-bullying of a school

employee.

For you to find the defendant1 guilty of this offense, the State must

prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant used a [computer] [computer network];

Second, that without the authorization of the school employee, the

defendant signed up2 (name school employee) [for electronic mailing

lists] [to receive junk electronic messages and instant messages];

Third, that the defendant had the intent to [intimidate] [torment]

that school employee;

Fourth, that the defendant was a student at (name school);

And Fifth, that the victim of the cyber-bullying was a school

employee.3

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date the defendant was a student and used a

[computer] [computer network] to sign up a school employee [for

electronic mailing lists] [to receive junk electronic messages and instant

messages] without the school employee’s authorization and with the

intent to intimidate or torment that school employee, it would be your

duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be

your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.72E (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-458.2 (b)(5). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
8a87521ad20426b9b4a5923767e69d6a4fd445f39e768e480fd282abc2c2692f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.