NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.72E
CYBER-BULLYING OF SCHOOL EMPLOYEE BY STUDENT-ELECTRONIC MAILING LISTS. MISDEMEANOR.
The defendant has been charged with the cyber-bullying of a school
employee.
For you to find the defendant1 guilty of this offense, the State must
prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant used a [computer] [computer network];
Second, that without the authorization of the school employee, the
defendant signed up2 (name school employee) [for electronic mailing
lists] [to receive junk electronic messages and instant messages];
Third, that the defendant had the intent to [intimidate] [torment]
that school employee;
Fourth, that the defendant was a student at (name school);
And Fifth, that the victim of the cyber-bullying was a school
employee.3
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or
about the alleged date the defendant was a student and used a
[computer] [computer network] to sign up a school employee [for
electronic mailing lists] [to receive junk electronic messages and instant
messages] without the school employee’s authorization and with the
intent to intimidate or torment that school employee, it would be your
duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a
reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, then it would be
your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.72E (June 2013). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-458.2 (b)(5). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8a87521ad20426b9b4a5923767e69d6a4fd445f39e768e480fd282abc2c2692f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.