NC · jury_instructions
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.20B
INCEST WITH A PERSON [THIRTEEN] [FOURTEEN] [FIFTEEN] YEARS OF AGE. FELONY. G.S. 14-178.
NOTE WELL: Use this instruction for offenses
occurring on or after December 1, 2002. For offenses
occurring before that date, use N.C.P.I.--Crim. 226.20.
The defendant has been charged with incest with a person
[thirteen] [fourteen] [fifteen] years of age.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the
State must prove five things beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant had vaginal intercourse with
another person. Vaginal intercourse is penetration, however
slight, of the female sex organ by the male sex organ.
Second, that the person with whom the defendant had vaginal
intercourse was the defendant’s [child] [stepchild] [legally
adopted child] [grandchild] [parent] [grandparent] [[brother]
[sister] of the [half] [whole] blood] [uncle] [aunt] [nephew]
[niece].
Third, that the defendant knew the person was (state
relationship).
Fourth, that at the time of the act, the victim was
[thirteen] [fourteen] [fifteen] years old.
N.C.P.I.--Crim. 226.20B
Page 2--Final Page
INCEST WITH A PERSON [THIRTEEN] [FOURTEEN] [FIFTEEN] YEARS OF
AGE. FELONY. G.S. 14-178. (Continued.)
And Fifth, that at the time of the act, the defendant was
[at least six]1 [more than 4 but less than six]2 years older than
the victim.3
If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
that on or about the alleged date the defendant had vaginal
intercourse with a person who was the defendant’s [child]
[stepchild] [legally adopted child] [grandchild] [parent]
[grandparent] [[brother] [sister] of the [half] [whole] blood]
[uncle] [aunt] [nephew] [niece], that the defendant knew the
person was (state relationship), and that at the time of the
acts alleged the victim was [thirteen] [fourteen] [fifteen]
years old and that the defendant was [at least six] [more than 4
but less than six] years older than the victim, then it would be
your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find
or have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things,
then it would be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.
History
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 226.20B (March 2003). Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.
Provenance
- Source
- sog.unc.edu
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
0be7ce986ba8adeda2f0d2c4c93f07432ea6b6159f609efba5449c39401cbd61
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.