Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 224.20

FAILURE TO RETURN [RENTED] [HIRED] PROPERTY. MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2003-03-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with willfully failing to return [rented]

[hired] property.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant [rented] [hired] (describe personal property)

from the victim.

Second, that on (name date), the personal property was due to be

returned to the possession of the owner. 1

Third, that the defendant failed to return it as required.

And Fourth, that this failure was willful, that is intentional and without

justification or excuse.

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant [rented] [hired] (describe personal

property) from the victim that was to be returned by (name date) and that

the defendant willfully failed to return it by that date, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a reasonable doubt

as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty to return a verdict

of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 224.20 (Replacement March 2003). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-167. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
b705c645e1c85b25b4d2b5981c82435d8be83a1048f7aea67350061aafa83934
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.