Bindinglaw

NC · jury_instructions

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 223.30

WILLFULLY DAMAGING [COMPUTERS] [COMPUTER PROGRAMS] [COMPUTER SYSTEMS] [COMPUTER NETWORKS]. FELONY; MISDEMEANOR.

activein force · 2009-06-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has been charged with willfully damaging

[computers] [computer programs] [computer systems] [computer

networks].

For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the State must

prove three things beyond a reasonable doubt:

First, that the defendant willfully [altered] [damaged] [destroyed] a

[computer] [computer program] [computer system] [computer network]

(or any part thereof).1

Second, that the defendant acted without authorization.

And Third, that the damage caused by the [alteration] [damage]

[destruction] was in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000).

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully and without authorization

[altered] [damaged] [destroyed] a [computer] [computer program]

[computer system] [computer network] (or any part thereof) and that the

damage caused by the [alteration] [damage] [destruction] was in excess

of one thousand dollars ($1,000), it would be your duty to return a verdict

of guilty of felonious damage to computers. If you do not so find or have

a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, you would not

return a verdict of guilty but would determine whether the defendant is

guilty of non-felonious damage to computers, which differs from the

felony in that the State need not prove that the damage caused was in

excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000).

If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or

about the alleged date, the defendant willfully and without authorization

[altered] [damaged] [destroyed] a [computer] [computer program]

[computer system] [computer network] (or any part thereof), it would be

your duty to return a verdict of guilty. If you do not so find or have a

reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things, it would be your duty

to return a verdict of not guilty.

History

N.C.P.I.—Crim. 223.30 (June 2009). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-455. Prepared by the North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges' Committee on Pattern Jury Instructions, assisted by the UNC School of Government; published by the School of Government.

Provenance

Source
sog.unc.edu
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
841c25f51d9e1444181643a387f8906b11f57ea18e2516125c519e64eebe7b37
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.C.P.I.—Crim. 223.30 — WILLFULLY DAMAGING [COMPUTERS… · binding.law